Today, I looked up the definitions of the word “level”, and what I found wasn’t what I expected. Maybe I should have expected unworkable definitions explaning what level is on a sphere. At least the scumbags are consistent.
If we live on a sphere, level looks like this:
What else could level be? But no mention of anything mentioning a flat plane with increasing distances from the sphere as you escape the center. Basically, “level” is a flat plane balanced on a ball. If a plane is not balanced on a sphere, then your plane or line absolutely CANNOT be considered to be level.
But what does Merriam-Webster say level is?
Well, first they give us what the tool, level is, I guess so we can have a better understaning of level.
Source: https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/level
The best definition includes “by means of a level”? Seriously? That’s like defining speed as “something measured by a speedometer”. And, anyway, how does that bubble thing work on a level if we’re on a sphere? And, why is level a measurement of fixed altitude? That might work if we’re on a flat plane, but we’re dealing with a globe here, aren’t we?
Is there a formula for an ever-increasing altitude as you get further away from the center of a level plane on a ball? Cuz, folks, that’s what would be happening if the world was a sphere. As you get further away from the center on a plane you are higher and higher in altitude. Maybe that’s how the level tool works? It tells you that your plane is perfectly balanced on a ball by that little bubble. But, nowhere in the definitions is there any mention of a plane in relation to a sphere. You only get horizontal this and altitude that, (and don’t forget about “by means of a level”) which makes more sense if we’re on a flat plane.
Maybe that’s the purpose? No . . . it is the purpose. If they changed the definition to include plane and sphere, then people would figure out how ridiculous and unworkable that definition is. Yeah, I should have expected this. Actually, I had a hunch, but their glaring omissions make a lot of sense if you want to control peoples’ beliefs.
Let’s delve in further if “level” was given to us truthfully. If you’re on a plane balanced on a ball, then the angle of force holding us down would change as we move from the center of a level plane. This is because gravity is pulling all things to it’s center from all around the sphere, right? It’s a radial force. As you move from the center it should be like walking into the wind. At the center, the force is on your head, but then walk to a wall and the angle of the force would adjust to your front. Has this ever been demonstrated in a lab to be true. If we had a level plane big enough, you should be able to set a ping ball at one end and watch angled gravity push it toward the center. So much for that radial force. How would a level tool work when the angled gravity keeps changing its force upon an object? Maybe the level would work in the exact center of a level plane, but when the angle of gravity changes, would it still work? I could not.
Are you starting to see how ridiculous level is on a globe? If you’re thinking, you should see it.
And people might conclude how unworkable a flat plane balanced on sphere is if they provided us with a truthful definition. But they are telling us to our faces what level really is. That’s the modus operandi. That revelation of the method thing seems to be at work. They’re telling us we’re not on a ball. You’re too stupid to figure it out, therefore you deserve what they do to you. Therefore, no crime has been commited against you. You did it to yourself.
Another thing to consider if level is a plane balanced on a sphere. If you could acheive level on a sphere then no two level planes would be at the same angle. If one plane had a laser 100 feet high pointing level (from its center) to another plane the same altitude a mile away to a target 100 feet high in its plane-center, then it would miss. You would have to adjust for the difference in angles of the two planes. But has that ever been demonstrated? Has that adjustment ever been needed?
This globe earth doesn’t any sense, does it? It’s stupid. It sucks. Thank God I don’t live on one.